Interested in quality articles about youth football? Then join Blueprint for Football Extra (for FREE!).
So, this is how it normally goes. You, a passionate football fan, take your son or daughter to practice as soon as they’re old enough. Hopefully you’re enlightened enough not to put too much pressure on them to prove that they’re a great talent but, still, there is that hope in you. And, unless they’re complete failures – which, in truth, most kids aren’t – or they really hate it you keep on taking them.
So, this is how it normally goes. You, a passionate football fan, take your son or daughter to practice as soon as they’re old enough. Hopefully you’re enlightened enough not to put too much pressure on them to prove that they’re a great talent but, still, there is that hope in you. And, unless they’re complete failures – which, in truth, most kids aren’t – or they really hate it you keep on taking them.
After all, everyone knows that with enough practise of the
right sort experts can be developed. Who
hasn’t heard of Ericsson’s 10,000 hour theory made famous by Malcolm Gladwell?
All of this is fine, as long as the kids are enjoying
themselves. They might not turn out to
be the football stars that you’re secretly hoping they become but their regular
attendance is not only keeping them healthy but it is also indirectly
instilling in them habits that will help them in other areas.
What could be a problem, however, is if they are forced to
keep practising one sport – and just one sport – in the vain hope that they put
in the required hours because the truth is that this isn’t helping them. In fact, it could be doing the opposite.
“There is a huge body of evidence now growing that suggests
that to specialise in one sport at an early age is actually detrimental upon
performance.” So says Dr. Martin Toms, Senior Lecturer in Sports Coaching at
the School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences at the University
of Birmingham.
“There is no doubt that young people grow, change and
develop at different rates and at different ages. So, specialising at a young age is a real
problem when the Bio-Psycho-Social changes that occur during puberty can get in
the way.”
“There is a vast amount of work now out there that provides
peer reviewed evidence to suggest that early specialisation can lead to injury;
psychological and social burnout; and the loss of wider sporting skills that a
young person might wish to use in the future.”
The best thing then is to encourage kids to try out as many
sports as they can. “The expectation and
evidence would suggest that sampling behaviour - when you play the most number
of sports at organised level - should occur throughout most of the secondary
School age period of eleven to sixteen.”
“This is less to do
with physiology and ability and more to do with availability of opportunity and
the age group systems we have in sport in the UK. Certainly throughout later primary
years and early secondary years – between the ages of ten and fifteen - kids
should be given the opportunity to experience as many activities as they wish
without pressure to select one or two to specialise in. But this will depend
upon availability and opportunity both of which are linked to many other
factors.”
Whilst there seems to be a consensus over the desirability
of practising a number of sports, the age at which one should start
specialising isn’t that clear cut.
“The growing evidence suggests again that the ideal age at
which to specialise entirely in one sport is the age when people are
physically, psychologically and socially mature enough to cope,” answers Dr.
Toms. “We must remember how differently
people develop, so there is no point working on a small 10 year old to become a
race horse jockey – since they may well end up over 6 feet tall by the time
they reach 18!”
“In other words, we do not develop in a linear fashion,
puberty has a huge amount of influence and so ability as well as talent change
as people grow and develop. Co-ordination being a key leveller as young people
grow up.”
“So, the age that people should specialise is actually
highly individual and based upon their Bio-Psycho-Social development and
technically this would be around 18.”
“However, realistically I would argue that between sixteen
and eighteen is probably where specialisation will begin to occur, but I would urge
all people reading this not to specialise in one activity, but play at least
two other sports at an organised level for as long as you can. In fact,
consider the most skill transfer compatible sports to support your main one
too!”
Indeed, that of transferring different skills from one sport
to another is the main argument in favour of non-specialisation “From my own
published research , there is a definite link between playing four or five sports
at the age of fourteen and achieving representative level in (at least) one of
these sports by the age of eighteen.”
All of this flies in the face of arguments that football
clubs have vociferously made over the years regarding the need to have exclusive
access to players from a very early age, stopping them from playing not only
other sports but even football for other teams.
Could this stance be down to football being a team sport and, as a
result, more complex to coach?
“No, I don’t believe that is the case,” comes the reply. “Whilst it is true that the intricacies and complexities are possibly more difficult to grasp than some other sports, the conversations I and many other colleagues have had, suggests that clubs asking children to play exclusively is down to other issues.”
“These include issues like the belief that it will reduce
the risk of injury and they might receive conflicting coaching advice. However,
there is also the accusation often pointed out that this is about power and
control over a young person. With a future ‘career’ at risk, would the young
person do anything else but comply?
Unlikely, even when the statistics for ‘making it’ at professional level
are stacked against you: approximately 99.8% of children will not make it.”
“The argument for stopping this 99% from playing other
sports whilst they are on contract can actually be argued to be detrimental to
the whole of British sport. I have heard it argued that there are thousands of
talented young sportspeople who are lost to other sports because they are
unable to develop those skills at any competitive level whilst on contract to a
club. Bearing in mind so few actually make it to the top level, this creates a
very interesting moral and philosophical thought for us all to consider –
regardless of our agendas – when we think about a young person’s development
and wider sporting potential.”
Indeed, the belief that early specialisation is essential
could be down to a myth.
“The culture of sport in the UK likes to adopt ideas from
other countries, and often these are not easily compatible with what we do. For
instance, the ideas from the Eastern Bloc such as the former USSR and, latterly,
China of ‘identifying’ talented kids at a young age and producing Olympic
champions is actually a myth.”
“In fact, they are simply playing the numbers game when
there are tensof thousands of kids, if not more, who start out and then one or
two Olympic champions are produced. Does
that means that the system is a success?”
“The numbers game will always work – but at what cost to the young people involved and their futures?”
If anything, research carried out by Dr Toms himself
indicates that by pushing just one sport shows that rather than providing
better athletes leads to more people dropping out from that sport.
“There are a number of sound reasons for this, and this is
something we are further exploring. Taking part in more than one sport allows
kids to develop a number of key skills – not just sport specific/related, but also
skills such as balance, spatial awareness and social skills.”
“As children develop at different rates, and puberty can
actually ‘stop’ participation in an activity through growth changes, it spreads
the risk of drop out. In other words, playing multiple sports allows for more
opportunity in the future. It’s not so much about spreading risk, but about
spreading opportunity.”
“The wider informal learning opportunity from (and across)
different sports is key to personal, social and psychological development, and
can certainly influence participation levels and rates.”
“Playing more than one sport allows ‘time out’ from the
other activity and will help prevent drop out and burn out.”
“There are many transferable skills across sports. In short, there are far more positive reasons
for young people TO play a number of sports than not to do so.”
You can - and should - follow Martin Toms’ work via Twitter
If you force kids to do anything against their will it will be a failure. There are many examples of successful players who chose to specialise early, in fact when I grew up there wasn't a choice and there were plenty of good players in those days. It depends who you ask??
ReplyDelete